The Bottle Kiln At Winchcombe Pottery: History, Celebration and Restoration.
All about the history of the bottle kiln at Winchcombe Pottery, through its time as Beckett’s pottery, under Michael Cardew and Ray Finch. Also includes information about the much needed restoration project happening today.
Winchcombe Pottery lies in the beautiful rolling hills of the Cotswolds. It is actually not really in Winchcombe proper, but a little place called Greet, right next to Winchcombe. This is the place where I got my first taste of production pottery. I was interested in throwing and had played around on a wheel before, but never seriously taken it up. My grandparents lived just 3 miles away in Stanton, so it seemed like a perfect spot to learn more about the craft. Little did I know, when I called up and spoke to Mike Finch, that I had stumbled upon the oldest working pottery in England. The pottery is still going and churning out a wide range of stoneware pots that live up to and represent its history: here's the current website.
But this isn't about my time there; it's about the old bottle kiln at the pottery which is in need of some tender loving care. Let's go back to the start of the place...
Winchcombe Pottery was not always called that. It started out as a brickworks and evolved into a brickyard and pottery called both Greet Pottery and Beckett's Pottery, before ending up as Winchcombe Pottery. The origins of the pottery are not well recorded. One of the main pieces of evidence we have is the bottle kiln itself.
The exact dates aren't known, but brick historian Martin Hammond, who surveyed the kiln in 1999, identified the bricks used in the lower parts of the kiln as late 18th century and those above and forming the conical chimney as 19th and 20th century. The discrepancy in age of the bricks makes sense as the upper parts of the kiln would have needed repair at various points. This is somewhat inevitable in a large kiln used over many decades like this.
The lower chamber was loaded from the ground floor and the top chamber from upstairs on the first floor. I love this idea, of having a kiln that big -- a two-storey kiln which you could walk into from both floors of the workshop. Here's a sweet drawing of the kiln done by Martin Hammond in 1999:
The bottle kiln you see today is out in the open, exposed to the elements, but from the time it was built in the late 1700's until the 1970's it was inside a building. This assuredly helped protect the kiln, but did add an element of danger as the building suffered several fires over the course of its history.
In the picture below you can see the ruble of the old building that stood around the kiln to the left of it. In the foreground is the old horse drawn pugmill that was used to prepare clay.
So, as I said before, the bricks in the lower part of the bottle kiln date the pottery to the late 18th century. At this stage it was a brickyard, producing bricks and tiles. The clay was dug from a pit onsite. It didn't take long before someone realised the clay was good for throwing, too, and started producing functional earthenware pottery as well. This clay and the bottle kiln were the backbone of the pottery until the 1950's.
The 1841 census shows that William Beckett, aged 45, was working as a brickmaker, as well as there a potter, employed on the premises. William Beckett passed the business on to his son Richard A. Beckett, who kept it going as a joint brickworks and pottery. The 1901 census shows several workers on site besides the Beckett's (Richard and his widowed mother): a "carter at the pottery," "one brickmaker," and one "flower pot maker."
Here is an undated postcard from the time when the business was under Richard Beckett, advertising some of the items produced there:
The Becketts clearly produced a range of essential products: not just bricks and tiles but pipes, garden pots, vases, and other kinds of practical glazed wares. This was a country pottery, catering to what people needed in a world before plastics. All of the wares were fired in the large bottle kiln.
Richard Beckett died in 1913 and his mother managed the place for a year after his death, until it was taken over by Winchcombe Brick and Tile Company Ltd in 1914. The making of pottery seems to have paused then until Michael Cardew came along in 1926 and revived it.
Michael Cardew managed to pursuad Elijah Comfort to come and work for him as a thrower. This was an important as Elijah was a production potter who had worked at the Beckett pottery for years. He was the head thrower (the "flower pot maker" from the 1901 census), and provided an essential bridge between two eras. Ron Wheeler, in his book "Winchcombe Pottery: The Cardew-Finch Tradition," says Elijah, "made an invaluable contribution... producing some of the old country ware for which the former pottery was known" (1998, p.32).
Cardew went on to employ several other potters, including Charlie and Sydney Tustin. The pots Cardew made at Winchcombe are widely regarded as his best. The line of tableware he designed at Winchcombe melded country pottery tradition and a modern sensibility, and have had great influence on the studio pottery world today. The pots he made at Winchcombe are highly sought after.
I don't want to go into Cardew too much, as that's a whole other rabbit hole. Needless to say, he is a legend. I would say he is second only to Bernard Leach in terms of influence on studio pottery today. There is an excellent short video of Cardew throwing and then loading pots into the bottle kiln called "One Good Turn." You can view it here.
The picture below is one of Cardew's pots in front of the kiln, taken by Dan Finnegan in the 1970s:
Here's a picture of the lower chamber all cleaned out today:
And here's a kiln packing drawing from one of Michael Cardew's notebooks, after packing wares into his first firing of the kiln on 12th January 1927:
Ray Finch joined the team in 1936 and Cardew left three years later to set up Wenford Bridge Pottery. Ray bought the pottery in 1946 and kept production going with the Tustin brothers. As time went by, Ray expanded production and hired other help. The pottery thrived under Ray's leadership, and many apprentices benefitted from his teaching. He ran the place until, 1979 when his son Mike Finch took the reins. Ray was still potting up until his death in 2011.
The bottle kiln has not been in use for a while. It was reportedly tricky to fire and Cardew famously would open the kiln up and break pots straight out of the kiln, unhappy with the results. Many lovely pots came out, but it seems that the loss rate was heavy. Ray tried to adapt the kiln in the 1940s, changing the brick chequer to a muffle inside, and putting in a bag wall. Unfortunately, this did not do enough to improve results, and a smaller separate kiln was constructed. This move coincided with Ray moving the pottery from slipware to stoneware. The bottle kiln was not suited for firing pots to higher stoneware temperatures. The final firing of the bottle kiln was in 1954.
So many fabulous pots have been fired in the old bottle kiln, not to mention the bricks, tiles and pipes from the early days. But the kiln is now in need of restoration and could use your help. Here's a link to the just giving page where you can support the project. The first step in this process of restoration has already begun; getting the kiln properly scanned in March.
Oliver Kent and David Dawson, along with the help of Bill Stebbing of Scan to PLAN did a full 3D laser scan of the kiln. The images are pretty amazing. I'll lay out a few here but if you want to see more and read the full post by Oliver its here. And if you really can't get enough of bottle kiln discussion, here's a pretty academic piece by Oliver and David, all about the origins of different bottle kiln designs across Britain.
There is also a five-minute fly through video on youtube which takes you around the whole kiln using these 3D images.
Using these images as a starting point, it is easier to see how much work the kiln needs. The plan is to carefully replace some of the original brickwork and lime mortar pointing to make the structure safe and secure. The work requires scaffolding and a skilled team of sympathetic builders.
As Matt Grimmitt, current manager at the pottery, writes on the restoration page, "this kiln represents a crossover between two worlds and the end of one industry being the country Potteries and the beginning of studio pottery as we know it today." I hope you agree that it is worthy of restoration and consider making a donation! Here's the link again.
One final picture to end on. I asked Matt Grimmitt for some pictures of pots fired in the bottle kiln. This one is in his personal collection, as you might be able to tell from the can of baked beans. This pancheon was thrown by Elijah Comfort and decorated by Michael Cardew. I love the strong form, rich quality of the lead glaze and fluidity of the wet slip combing. There is a lot right about this pot. I would eat baked beans out of it anyday. Screw the minor risk of lead poisoning.
Pots and Skeletons in the Actun Tunichil Muknal (ATM) Cave, Belize.
A visit into the deep, dark ATM Cave in Western Belize near San Ignacio. All about our adventure seeing the archeological artefacts, skeletons, pottery and incredible stalactites and stalagmites of the cave.
Lauren and I recently went to Belize for two weeks. I was surprised by the wild mix of cultures there—I encourage you to read about the country's history here. Belize today has Creole, Maya, Garifuna, and Mestizo cultures; there are also Mennonites who are of German descent. Every bus we went on blared out a mixture of reggae and calypso music. The staple food is rice and beans with Jamaican style jerk chicken (we ate this a lot). Queen Elizabeth II is still the symbolic head of state, and sits on the currency, but Belize became an independent nation in 1981. The people we met seemed grateful for Britain's continued involvement, especially in fending off the Guatemalan government's threats (it has been trying to claim Belize since its independence).
On May 12 (Lauren's 29th birthday, no less) we decided to go underground, into the depths of the Actun Tunichil Muknal (ATM) Cave in Western Belize, near San Ignacio. Actun Tunichil Muknal translates as "Cave of the Stone Sepulcher." If you are thinking about Indiana Jones already, then just wait. The ATM is an hour's drive from San Ignacio, or 45 minutes from a fabulous hostel we stayed at called Lower Dover (hands down the best place we stayed and tastiest meals we had on our trip). You pass through a small village called "Tea Kettle" on the way, which made me inordinately happy. Once you park up, it's about an hour trek through the jungle, including two rivers which you have to swim across. This means that you can only access the cave certain times of the year. We saw several snake tracks crisscrossing the trail en route, as well as a massive tarantula in a tree hollow.
Once we reached the cave mouth, there was a last opportunity to pee and soak up a little Vitamin D before plunging into the turquoise waters. Once inside the initial opening, you are mostly wading though knee to chest-deep water all the way through the cave (thankfully the water wasn't too cold). I found all of these pictures on the internet by the way, as we weren't allowed cameras in the cave. For good reason, I might add—in 2012 an ancient skull was broken by a tourist dropping his camera on it.
The cave was rediscovered in 1989, and opened to the public in 1998, although archeological research continued until 2003. Our guide told us that for the Mayan people, caves were seen as a liminal space between life and death, an underworld. You can believe it when you see the gigantic stalactites hanging from the ceilings, bigger than most church organs. We know now how these were formed—through the slow process of calcium carbonate eroding from limestone above and dripping down into the cave below. But to people hundreds of years ago, these structures must have seemed supernatural.
At a certain point, after swimming, scrambling, and squeezing your way deep in the cave, (over 3km) you get to a large boulder and steep ledge (pictured on the right). Our guide helped us climb over it, into the entrance to the inner cavern, where the majority of the archeological finds have been made.
We were instructed to leave our shoes behind, before entering a vast chamber. The room felt like a great hall, or a cathedral, and led into several other large chambers. As we walked through, our guide pointed out the multitude of human bones scattered around.
The cathedral is pictured below. You can see how the water has flown through the chamber, forming the undulating pattern on the floor. We were told to walk on the ridges as these are harder deposits of calcium carbonate, and the troughs between them are where many artefacts have been found.
We know that human sacrifices were performed in the cave. Fourteen complete skeletons have been found to date; seven adults and seven children, and many more partial remains. Most were killed with blunt blows to the head. It is believed that these were ritualistic killings performed in an attempt to please the gods during a particularly brutal drought. Geologists have found that there was a 60-year period preceding 811AD during which almost no rain fell in the region. It's estimated that Belize had a population of about two million people prior to that time; now, it has fewer than 400,000. The landscape was likely much more deforested than it is today, and geologists surmise this may have had an impact on the sudden lack of rainfall. A more detailed discussion of this history can be found here.
Whilst other factors such as disease could have been involved, the severe drought was likely the main cause of the collapse of the Mayan civilisation. Imagine entering the cave during that time to find water still percolating through the ceiling and dripping all around. You can see why they equated the cave with a life-giving force.
One particularly gruesome skeleton is the "crystal maiden"; she was an 18-year-old whose heart was removed (or at least that's what it seems like as two of her vertebrates are broken apart). Over time, she has become covered in beautiful, fine sparkling calcium carbonate deposits. This photo doesn't do it justice. I couldn't help but think of Indiana Jones in there—it was surreal, and there are few barriers between you as a tourist and these crystalline bones.
Whilst these skeletons are hard to accurately date, we do have other human evidence left behind. Pots! Of course! Only a fool goes wading into the depths of the earth without a picnic. I had heard before we went that there were pots down in the cave, and that was a main reason for going, but I was not prepared for the amount of pots or the scale of them. There were shards of pots all over the main hall, I'm not exaggerating. Archeologists have found and cataloged over 14,000 artefacts down there. They have been dated to between AD250-909, mostly in the latter end of that age range. This supports the hypothesis of links between the drought and ritual use of the cave as the Mayan civilisation was collapsing.
Mostly the pots were in clusters, around the sooty remnants of fire pits and fireplaces in the large chambers. It almost seemed like campsites left by unruly teenagers, empty beer bottles strewn around for someone else to clear up.
I was fascinated by the pots, not least because of the size of some of them, and how thin the wall thickness of many of them were. They are really nicely made—wood fired, earthenware pots. Archeologists have tested them and found residues of food on the insides.
Having barely scraped my way into the cave, I can't imagine how they got these pots full of corn or rice or other supplies into the cave in one piece.
Quite a few of the pots were complete and in very good condition. We saw them placed all around the chamber, often underneath stalactites, presumably to collect water. We tried some of this water at one spot (upon our guides suggestion) and found it quite delicious—filtered through the earth and limestone.
Many of the pots appear to have been intentionally broken and are marked with "kill holes," suggesting that they were used in sacrificial rituals, too. Here is an article about kill holes—basically they are pots with intentionally pierced holes in them, though we're not entirely sure why. It would seem silly to me to carefully juggle pots and a lit torch into the depths of the cave, only to smash them, but hey, I'm a potter and not a shaman.
I couldn't believe we were allowed to be so close to the artefacts. Unscrupulous individuals could easily take pieces of pots out without anyone noticing. Our guide told us of one person he took in who came out rattling, pockets filled with shards. They need a better protection policy.
Look at the beautiful surface and rim on this pot:
Most of the pots were large, round storage and cooking vessels but there were a few other shapes around, too, such as these bowls:
Possibly the most curious pot in the cave is this one (to the right and below). This monkey decoration has only been found on four pots, located at various sites across Central America.
I was not able to find much information about these monkey vessels—if anyone knows, let me know!
Well, that's all for now. We got out of the cave alive, dried off, and had a delicious lunch of rice, beans, salad, and plantains. Hope you can sleep tonight!
Interview with Takuro Shibata at the 'Wild Clay' show, StarWORKS N.C.
Interview with Takuro Shibata all about wild North Carolina clays, how he got StarWORKS clay started and some specifics of how to formulate your own clay body and deal with defects in it.
A few weeks ago I went back to StarWORKS and re-visited the Wild Clay Show, which is on display there. The show opened at the International Wood Fire Conference (WOODFIRE NC), which I covered in depth in my last blog post. It was nice to take a closer look without so many people about, and I was lucky enough to be able to interview Takuro Shibata about the show. Takuro set up and runs STARworks clay business whilst also managing to make lovely pots at their place (Studio Touya) with his wife Hitomi.
In the interview I also asked Takuro some specifics of making a successful clay body, his interest in wild clay, and how the StarWORKS clay factory got started, amongst other things. First, I've put up some pictures of the show and then below laid out a transcription of our interview. I think this is one of those rare situations where the words are actually more interesting than the pictures.
Oh and also, if you are a potter and haven't tried any of STARworks clay then you should give it a go, its beautiful stuff!
I meet Takuro at the Wild Clay exhibit after two very engaging artist talks by Tony Clennell and Dan Finnegan. 'Wild Clay' is in a large industrial-scale room with the previous year's FIREfest sculptures along one wall and an imposing installation by Daniel Johnston on the other side. There are people next door noisily grinding and polishing glass. The crunchy screeching sound bounces off the tall ceiling and reverberates around us. I ignore it and dive in...
HAMISH: So how did the 'Wild Clay' show come together?
TAKURO: It was a group effort between Steve Blankenbeker of Taylor Clay Products, Josh Copus, Michelle Flowers, Michael Hunt, Fred Johnston, Hitomi Shibata, Takuro Shibata, David Stuempfle and Erin Young, as well as many others who helped out along the way. Dave Stuempfle came up with the idea originally and then worked with us all to put it together. It was fun. We had a smaller version at the Pottery Centre and then expanded it for WOODFIRE N.C. We could do more I think. Josh worked really hard on these pieces (he points to the 'Clay Landscapes').
H: Seeing this show and your talk on wild clay got me really excited about digging my own materials.
T: Yes, that would be fun. I hope more people get interested in wild clays and local materials. It depends where you are as to what you can find. Out in Utah, there are many different minerals which are good for using in glazes, and then in some areas you can find earthenware clays. Around here we don't find much earthenware clay, but there is much good clay for stoneware potters. We might be able to find earthenware clays because there has been a tradition of this pottery in North Carolina, but we haven't found it yet.
H: How did you get started? How much clay did you make the first year?
We came here in 2005 and no, nothing, no clay making. We had to find the sources first. And see what we could do. Many people helped us get going, including Mark Hewitt and Steve Blankenbaker. To begin with, we talked to Highwater and distributed their clays, because we had space and many people use that clay. We set up some equipment. Maybe in 2009, we started actually making our own clay bodies. I thought initially that we could sell a body based on Mitchfield, but not many people liked it. You need to make clay that is ready to make pots. Our first clay was 100% Cameron, just to test the equipment. We had a lot of set up and testing. Local clays are so different too from commercial clays. People were nervous at first. Some didn't even want to touch it!
H: It seems like Steve Blankenbaker has been very helpful in finding clays...
T: Yes. Steve is the clay man. He really knows which clay might be good for potters to use. When he goes out with his team to collect clay he gets the very best parts and separates them out for us. He gives us the best of the best.
H: Coming from Shigaraki, famous for its coarse clay, did you want to try to find a similar clay body?
T: Oh, no, not at all. I don't look for Shigaraki clay here. Everywhere you go you can find clays unique to that area. I wanted to try in North Carolina. I was kind of hoping we would find something. In Massachusetts, we couldn't find any local clay to touch, but in Virginia we found some. Then when we came to Seagrove and found some local potters processing their own clays; this was so exciting for us. Why are people not interested in local clay? That was my question in the beginning.
H: What does a commercial clay manufacturing process look like? How does it differ from what you do here?
T: Most companies buy processed commercial powdered clay and dump them into a big mixer, adding water and there, that is the clay. The materials are already fine. It is much quicker and less work for the clay company, because half of the process has already been done by the mine. It is much more convenient. But you don't have too many choices, because big mines are limited. If you go to Massachusetts or Florida, or another part of the states, most people are using the same sources of clay. Probably their recipes differ a little bit -- you might have a little bit more red art or gold art or om4, for example. There isn't much regional uniqueness in commercial clays from the south to the east coast to the west coast. The clay of North Carolina is different than the clay in other parts. Some of the clays we have here are basically self glazing though, like the Mitchfield. It has so much silica in it. The Cameron has lots of silica too. Generally it seems like the local North Carolina clays have higher silica than most ball clays or commercial clays. It is fun to use the local clay. It gives a distinct character to the pottery.
H: I totally agree. Also, if you dig your own clay, it's free.
T: And it is more unique!
H: Yeah, I mean, to know this was from my back garden or a stream down the hill -- I think that is so much better than buying commercial clays made with powders from mines all over the world. Maybe I am just romantic.
T: No, I think it would be fun if more people used more local clays and local materials.
H: And that's how it was in the old days wasn't it?
T: Yes, exactly. Pottery villages pop up where there is an abundance of local materials fit for making pottery. In Japan, all the pottery villages were built on clay. They found good clay and started making pottery. Clay comes first. Then they tried to fire the clay and figured out the best way to use that clay. In Shigaraki for example, they need to fire hot to get the flashing and ash to melt, but in Bizen they cannot fire that hot. They have to fire slower and to lower temperatures to make beautiful functional pots. That is fun! They are aware of there own uniqueness.
H: It is a kind of language...
T: Yes; they have an entirely different way of firing and different styles of kilns, all because of the clay. But here, you go into a ceramic supply shop and say, "I have to get a cone 10 clay..." (laughter). No, the clay you dig from the ground might need to be right fired a little bit lower or a little higher. You can try different glazes on it. For me it is very interesting to figure out how to best use the materials that we have around here. I think those regional differences help artists, too.
H: I think a lot of people are becoming more and more interested in using local materials in all walks of life. But it seems like your clay business is going really well. Are you providing clay to an ever-growing list of potters?
T: Yes it is going well, but it is also a big responsibility, supplying these potters. I get worried when I see potters firing their big kilns on Facebook. It is so scary to me. It used to be that the clay maker did not see all these kilns being opened. But now, you really see. It's a lot of responsibility, but we are trying our best. And the clay is changing, as it's natural. It's always challenging.
H: How close to full capacity do you think you are?
T: It depends on equipment and how many people we have working. Eventually we will be at capacity, unless we get more equipment. But we want to keep the quality good, too, so if we got too big, that's more difficult to manage, too. If we can keep the business healthy, providing clay to local artists, then, that might be a good thing -- not necessarily having too many people working.
H: But you haven't turned anyone down yet?
T: No. Not yet. We are trying to make more. Yes. We will see. We can increase a bit more.
H: So I recently mixed my own first batch of clay with Stillman (my fellow apprentice at Mark Hewitt's Pottery) and learnt a lot in the process. To begin with, it was not very plastic, but as it aged it grew more workable...
T: All of your clay particles need to get really wet. The best way is to mix it from dry into a slip. Then dry it out again. But it still takes time for the water to fully penetrate into the clay particles.
H: Do you think pugging adds plasticity, kind of like how kneading bread adds gluten to the dough?
T: No, but using a de-airing pugmill and letting the clay sit in a vacuum does help. If you take dry clay and add it to water and then try to throw with it straight away, then it will not be plastic -- there is still so much air in the clay. When you let it sit, it completely changes. The pug mill saves your wrists and also time.
H: We threw some of the wild clays you use on their own and the differences were staggering -- the Catawba was super plastic and threw like a dream, whereas the Mitchfiled was terrible -- full of rocks and would just rip apart on the wheel...
T: [Laughing] Yes, well, you should try a 50/50 mix of the Mitchfield and Okeewemee. They are both very difficult to work with individually, but when mixed together, you can make anything you like. You can throw cups really thin. You can easily throw things too thin because it throws so well.
H: Really? That is so weird to me. It reminds me of "eutectics" in chemistry (where you add two materials together and the resulting melting point is wildly different from either of them individually)...
T: It has a lot to do with the size of the clay particles. You would think a 50/50 blend of Catawba and Okeewemee would be a good blend, because Catawba by itself is so plastic, but you would be surprised. It is awful clay.
H: So you recommend 50/50 mixes of different clays as a good starting point for making a clay body?
T: Definitely, 50/50 tells you a lot. It tells you which clays would be a good combination because some are really bad. I try to find out the good combinations and then I use that as a base. If I still need to have a little bit more color, I might add some Okeewemee. Or sometimes we need more silica for the firing, so we'll throw in some more Mitchfield clay. Most of these clays are very high-temperature, so you can add feldspar to lower the firing temperature. The mesh of the feldspar also makes a difference. 200 mesh can help. This makes clay sometimes easier to work with if it's cracking. Cameron by itself can crack in the firing. But first you need to know each individual clay character, then which combinations work. Like mixing the Mitchfield and Okeewemee; you may find it's fantastic. Wow, you would not have expected that!
H: We sieved our first batch of clay pretty coarsely, trying to keep a lot of the natural rocks in the clay. I found it much more abrasive than the clay I'm used to -- it made throwing a batch of cereal bowls almost painful. But I like the look of the trimmed feet a lot...
T: When I was learning in Shigaraki, the clay was very coarse. When one of my teachers would make flower vases, he would wear a glove. I thought this was kind of interesting, because it must be hard to feel the clay as he was throwing. He knew how to throw already and he didn't want to scratch his hand too much. If you can make good pots with a glove, it's fine! The glove could be one tool, if you want coarse rocks to show up in your pots.
H: How do you deal with defects such as bloating in clay bodies?
T: It's all a balance. Some clay shrinks more, so you are more likely to get cracks. This is why our sculpture clay has less clay in it and more pre-fired elements; so it shrinks less. If the body has a good balance of particle sizes then even if it shrinks a lot it will be less prone to cracking. Also, with non-plastic clays, water will migrate through the body much faster -- one drop of water on a block of really unplastic clay will cause it to totally fall apart. This is really important when you are using slips or raw glazes. Plastic materials stop water migrating through the clay. An extremely fine clay like bentonite will stop the migration of water almost entirely.
H: When you first got going, did you only have a few clays to play with?
T: Yes, when we started we only had Cameron and Okeewemee. That was it. If you have just these two, you can't do much, which is why in the beginning we had to add some Foundry Hill Cream or other powdered clays to make it work. Which was okay. I mean, it wasn't using 100% local clay, but if you have to use some commercial clay, that's okay. Our goal is to make 100% North Carolina clay bodies. 100% is more unique, but sometimes, with sculpture clay, the purpose is different. It should be sturdy and not get too many cracks. That's more important. We should use grog instead of rock, for instance, because grog is already fired. The rocks in the clay will expand and contract more. Grog is more stable. Silica rocks can cause problems, but for making pots, that could make them more interesting in terms of texture and character.
H: Alright, well, that was fabulous Takuro, thank you so much for talking with me.
T: Thank you.